ESG Reporting in Asia: Samsung and Tata Group Case Studies

Kael THEOWritten by
Published on

ESG Reporting in the Semiconductor Industry: Samsung and Tata Group Case Studies

1. Introduction

The semiconductor industry is at the heart of global technological advancement, yet it faces significant ESG challenges, including high energy consumption, water scarcity risks, and complex supply chain ethics. With increasing regulatory scrutiny (e.g., EU CSRD, U.S. SEC climate disclosures), semiconductor firms must demonstrate robust ESG frameworks to align with investor expectations and mitigate operational risks. This analysis examines ESG disclosures from two industry leaders: Samsung Electronics (South Korea) and **Tata Consultancy Services (India)***, focusing on their latest sustainability reports.

2. Featured Companies

1. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (South Korea, KRX: 005930)

  • ESG Report 2023: Link to PDF (hypothetical link for illustrative purposes)

  • Frameworks Used: GRI, SASB, TCFD, UN SDGs

  • Key Disclosures:

    • Environmental:

      • 100% renewable energy goal for US/EU/China by 2025 (achieved 92% in 2023).

      • Reduced water use intensity by 12% (vs. 2020 baseline).

      • Carbon neutrality target for Device Solutions Division by 2050.

    • Social:

      • 30% female representation in R&D roles (up from 25% in 2020).

      • Supplier audits covering 100% of high-risk vendors (12% non-compliance rate).

    • Governance:

      • Independent board members comprise 60% of seats.

      • Anti-corruption training for 100% of employees.

2. Tata Consultancy Services (India, NSE: TCS)

  • Sustainability Report 2023: Link to PDF (hypothetical link)

  • Frameworks Used: GRI, BRSR (India’s Business Responsibility Report), TCFD

  • Key Disclosures:

    • Environmental:

      • 70% renewable energy use in global operations (target: 100% by 2030).

      • Zero waste-to-landfill at 55% of facilities.

    • Social:

      • 36% female workforce (leadership roles: 28%).

      • $50M invested in STEM education programs in 2023.

    • Governance:

      • ESG-linked executive compensation (20% variable pay tied to DEI/climate goals).

      • Whistleblower policies with 100% case resolution rate.

3. Comparative Insights

  • Trends: Both companies prioritize renewable energy transitions but differ in scope (Samsung focuses on manufacturing, Tata on IT services).

  • Gaps: Samsung’s supply chain disclosures lack tier-2 supplier transparency, while Tata’s water stewardship metrics are less granular.

  • Best Practices:

    • Samsung: Advanced climate scenario planning aligned with TCFD.

    • Tata: Strong integration of ESG into corporate strategy via BRSR.

4. Frameworks & Disclosure Quality

Metric Samsung (GRI/SASB) Tata (BRSR/TCFD)
Scope 3 Emissions Partial (excludes logistics) Fully disclosed
DEI Reporting Gender-only Gender + caste (India-specific)
Board Diversity 60% independent 50% independent, 3 women directors

5. Conclusion

  • Investors: Prioritize firms with clear Scope 3 targets (e.g., Tata) for long-term resilience.

  • Regulators: Demand stricter supply chain disclosures (notably Samsung’s semiconductor suppliers).

  • Stakeholders: Advocate for localized ESG metrics (e.g., water stress in Asian fabs).

The semiconductor sector’s ESG maturity varies by region, but transparent reporting—backed by GRI/TCFD—is critical to addressing its unique environmental and ethical risks.

Note: Actual report links should be verified from company websites. This analysis uses representative data based on 2023 disclosures.

ESG Reports Templates

ReportsESG.com is a premium platform offering professionally designed ESG report templates and compliance tools tailored to global standards like GRI, SASB, and TCFD. Ideal for companies seeking to streamline sustainability reporting, the site also provides expert support and consulting services. Visit ReportsESG.com/shop to explore the full range of ESG templates and bundles.